in reply to Re^3: String Search
in thread String Search

Yes, unfortunately as my currently lowly Monkly status shows, whilst I've had an account for a while, I'm new to contributing around here, and thought that since your response appeared to solve most of his problem, I wasn't going to start a new thread.

Anyway, not sure what the default visible reply depth is, but I'm sure it's more than 2....

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: String Search
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 01, 2012 at 12:07 UTC
    lowly Monkly status

    Hm. Two years is normally more than enough time to spot the patterns of usage in this place.

    I wasn't going to start a new thread.

    Posting a second direct response to the OP is not "starting a new thread".

    not sure what the default visible reply depth is, but I'm sure it's more than 2....

    Its not about depth; its about him getting a notification that he has a reply.

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

    RIP Neil Armstrong
[reply]
      2 years it would be plenty if I visited regularly. Its actually 2 years with a huge gap after I got the problem I wanted solved... :-)
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom