Re^3: Mouse role fails

If ActiveState and Strawberry are on the same box, it might be that they are getting confused about their libraries. XS libraries built for one are very unlikely to run correctly on the other.

Also, for what it's worth, Moo is gaining traction over Mouse as a light-weight Moose replacement. Although its surface syntax is less Moose-compatible, its killer feature is that if Moo detects that Moose has been loaded, it can inflate Moo classes and roles into full Moose classes and roles.

perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'

Comment on Re^3: Mouse role fails

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Mouse role fails by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Nov 04, 2012 at 19:19 UTC
Hi, i also thought about giving MOO a try. The platform for the ETL stuff that i have to do is M$-Dog with IIS 7. I have very little influence on the setup of this box - that means: use good old CGI. So performance is really an issue. And the tool must run under cmd too. What do you think about this? Regards, Karl	[reply]
Re^5: Mouse role fails by tobyink (Canon) on Nov 04, 2012 at 19:45 UTC
That link benchmarks Moo 0.009007 which is over 18 months old; the current version is 1.000005. An important speed factor for Moo is the availability of Class::XSAccessor. If that module is installed, Moo uses it to create very fast accessors. If it's not installed, Moo falls back to slower, pure Perl accessors. Because I've recently been working with Ingy on Moos (despite the name, it's actually smaller than Moo), I have some fairly up-to-date benchmarks for accessors across the Moose family... https://github.com/tobyink/moos-pm/blob/master/devel.benchmarks/bench-results-IntelAtomN270%401.6GHz.txt Moo has the fastest of the pure Perl accessors; and with XS, again it's the fastest. `perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'`	[reply]
Re^6: Mouse role fails by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Nov 04, 2012 at 21:36 UTC
This sounds great, i will try it. Regards, Karl	[reply]