in reply to Re: Re: transliterate
in thread transliterate
Benchmark: timing 250000 iterations of one, two... one: 1 wallclock secs ( 0.83 usr + 0.00 sys = 0.83 CPU) two: 1 wallclock secs ( 0.74 usr + 0.00 sys = 0.74 CPU) Benchmark: timing 2000000 iterations of one, two... one: 7 wallclock secs ( 6.71 usr + 0.00 sys = 6.71 CPU) two: 6 wallclock secs ( 5.93 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.93 CPU)
Benchmark: timing 250000 iterations of one, two... one: 1 wallclock secs ( 0.26 usr + 0.00 sys = 0.26 CPU) @ 96 +1538.46/s (n=250000) (warning: too few iterations for a reliable count) two: 1 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr + 0.00 sys = 0.46 CPU) @ 54 +3478.26/s (n=250000) Benchmark: timing 2000000 iterations of one, two... one: 2 wallclock secs ( 2.06 usr + 0.00 sys = 2.06 CPU) @ 97 +0873.79/s (n=2000000) two: 4 wallclock secs ( 3.68 usr + 0.00 sys = 3.68 CPU) @ 54 +3478.26/s (n=2000000)
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: transliterate
by trantor (Chaplain) on Jul 27, 2001 at 22:39 UTC |