in reply to Re: What is the scope of $_?
in thread What is the scope of $_?

<tangent> How is @_ not global in scope? I mean, it gets implicitly localized on any subroutine call, but it's present by default and package independent:
use strict; use warnings; @_ = @ARGV; package Foo; print for @_; @_ = qw(1 2 3 4 5); { local @_ = reverse @_; print for @_; } package main; print for @_;
</tangent>

#11929 First ask yourself `How would I do this without a computer?' Then have the computer do it the same way.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: What is the scope of $_?
by tobyink (Canon) on Nov 26, 2012 at 19:35 UTC

    You are correct. I was under the impression that a reference to @_ behaved differently than a reference to another localized array, once the localization went out of scope.

    But the following example appears to show they behave the same...

    use strict; use Data::Dumper; our @X; my ($underscore, $scissors); @_ = (1..3); @X = (1..3); sub foo { local @X = (4..6); $underscore = \@_; $scissors = \@X; } foo(4..6); print Dumper($underscore, $scissors);

    So (like $_) @_ is just a global array that gets localized by certain control structures. (In particular, sub.)

    perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'