Re: LWP is not SIGPIPE safe?

I am failing to see a question in your comments. I will assume that your question is along the lines of "why, if HTTP::Tiny has this protection, does not LWP?"

Perhaps you can make a case for it on the mailing list (as found on the LWP documentation page), or create a patch and submit it on the github repository.

--MidLifeXis

Comment on Re: LWP is not SIGPIPE safe?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: LWP is not SIGPIPE safe? by OlegG (Monk) on Nov 28, 2012 at 13:30 UTC
Question is in subject of this topic	[reply]
Re^3: LWP is not SIGPIPE safe? by zwon (Abbot) on Nov 28, 2012 at 15:47 UTC
Answer to this question is in the body of the question ;) As you can see from the code it is not handling SIGPIPE itself. On the other hand nothing prevents you from setting handler in your script from which you're using LWP.	[reply]
Re^4: LWP is not SIGPIPE safe? by OlegG (Monk) on Nov 28, 2012 at 16:03 UTC
If so, then it is a bug. Because it is even not documented, that I should install sigpipe handler myself. Ok, it seems I should make test and report it.	[reply]