Apply some magic and better ignore the troll! =)

Anonymous Monk expresses a few simple ideas and chromatic has to start conflating them on purpose

 $1 ... foo() there is no ambigiuity, the potential exists for this bug

so what is the problem with a user asking for extra warnings, extra debugging mode, extra potential criticism, even if they don't cover 100% of all situations, even if they can be wrong, even if it requires a special compile of perl for descend into xs, or running scandeps, or whatever?

oh right, must be a troll

P::C depends on PPI.

PPI does per definition static parsing.

What you're asking is far beyond the scope of P::C!

But if you think it's feasible, you're more than welcome do demonstrate we are wrong by releasing such a new magic tool.

So ... either you lack the know how to understand the limitations of parsing a dynamic language or you are trolling us.

In both cases no need to waist more time with someone who hides behind anonymity.

Cheers Rolf

WOW

Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::UndefinedBehaviourMaybeQuoteit / $1 not quoted (value not frozen) undefined behaviour