in reply to Re^3: status of perl/tk?
in thread status of perl/tk?

Tcl::pTk looks interesting. Unfortunately it looks like I would have to compile tcl from source to get a version recent enough to work (wants 9.0, ubuntu currently has 8.5). Even if I was willing to do that, I don't think my users would be.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: status of perl/tk?
by bulk88 (Priest) on Dec 25, 2012 at 04:51 UTC
    Looked at ActiveTcl?
Re^5: status of perl/tk?
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 25, 2012 at 05:51 UTC

    Unfortunately it looks like I would have to compile tcl from source to get a version recent enough to work (wants 9.0, ubuntu currently has 8.5).

    Not only that, you'll have to compile some TCL modules too

    ;) Unfortunate? Yeah, a lot of people say stupid stuff like this -- I've been saying it for decade -- building your own GUI toolkit (Prima) is much harder :)

    Even if I was willing to do that, I don't think my users would be.

    If you don't want your users to jump through hoops (good idea), then distribute binaries good buddy :) http://citrusperl.com//http://cavapackager.com/