Re: Hash of arrays
by NetWallah (Canon) on Dec 28, 2012 at 06:23 UTC
|
The basic access syntax code you posted looks fine , but could be better formated using <code> tags:
foreach $newdn (sort keys %newgrouphash ) {
print "Name:$newdn\n\t";
foreach $group ( sort @{$newgrouphash{$newdn}} ) {
print "$group, ";
}
print "\n";
}
If you print like the code above, the name should print only once.
"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest."
-Confucius
| [reply] [d/l] |
|
|
Thanks, I still get this result:
Name:
Name:CN=test123,OU= etc etc
The group prints fine
| [reply] |
|
|
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As others have suggested, please post the code where you do the "push", and the "print".
I re-read your statement:
I am pushing a user name and an array of AD groups for that user name into a hash of arrays
So -it sounds like you are pushing both the NAME and the GROUP into the hash value.
This is in addition to the name being in the Key.
If this is the case, it would indeed explain the name coming out twice, since you (or at least my posted code) prints the key and value.
Anyway - this discussion would be a lot less abstract and hypothetical, if you posted your actual code.
In it's absence, interest in assisting you is rapidly waning.
"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest."
-Confucius
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I still get this result: Name: Name:CN=test123,OU= etc etc The group prints fine Funny :)
If you want help, you'll need to provide sample data (as in Data::Dump, Data::Dumper ... ) as Basic debugging checklist explains
| [reply] |
|
|
Sorry, new here, I used the print statements from the previous posters suggestions. The actual data being pushed into the HOA is a lot of code and is an AD query so it wouldn't compile.
What I end up with is a key of Bob and an array containing groups: domain users, testing, server team etc
push (@{$newgrouphash{"$newdn"} },"$newgroup");
foreach $newdn (sort keys %newgrouphash ) {
print "Name:$newdn\n\t";
foreach $group ( sort @{$newgrouphash{$newdn}} ) {
+
if (!($group =~ /CN=Domain Users/i)) {
# print "$group, ";
+
$res = `dsmod group $group -rmmbr \"$newdn\"`;
+
print "$res\n";
| [reply] [d/l] |
Re: Hash of arrays
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 28, 2012 at 05:57 UTC
|
Post real code, code that compiles , code that runs, code that produces output, and the output, code and data insice <c></c> tags ( How do I post a question effectively? )
Is there a better way of accessing the information in a hash of arrays?
Not really. You could use Data::Diver, but a HoA is shallow enough not to need it
| [reply] [d/l] |
Re: Hash of arrays
by 7stud (Deacon) on Dec 28, 2012 at 10:01 UTC
|
The actual data being pushed into the HOA is a lot of code and is an AD query so it wouldn't compile
And that is the setting you chose to learn how to use HOA's? Try this instead: post some code that builds an HOA from the data in a file, and then prints out all the keys and their values. Post the file and your code.
| [reply] |
|
|
Thanks, I was using %newgrouphash = undefined; to declare my hash instead of %newgrouphash = ();
That is where the extra key was coming from.
forever learning - thanks for the help
| [reply] |
|
|
use strict;
use warnings;
at the top of your code, it would have pointed out your problem, with the message:
Use of uninitialized value in list assignment at ..
(This comes from 'use warnings;')
There is overwhelming agreement here that those two directives should be at the top of EVERY script you write, and you have just experienced an instance where it could have saved days of questioning and struggle.
"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest."
-Confucius
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
Re: Hash of arrays
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 28, 2012 at 14:00 UTC
|
Most of the time you use hash references, each element of which in this case would contain an array reference. A reference is "a single thing" i.e. "a scalar," yet it can "refer to" anything at all. Perl syntax is flexible and makes it easy to write that. | [reply] |