in reply to return of hash-assigment in list context (bug?)

What version of perl are you using? With my 
This is perl 5, version 14, subversion 2 (v5.14.2) built for i686-linu
+x-gnu-thread-multi-64int

[download]
I get the results that I would expect, with no duplicated values: 
$ perl
%h1=(a=>1,b=>2);
%h2=(a=>11,c=>3);
print (%h3=(%h1,%h2),"\n");
 
print %h3, "\n";
a11b2c3
c3a11b2

[download]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: return of assigment in list context (bug!)
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 02, 2013 at 14:06 UTC
    This is perl, v5.10.0 built for i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi

    Thanks a lot... so it's an already fixed bug and I can stop chasing my faults! :)

    Cheers Rolf

[reply]
[d/l]

      It appears to have been fixed between 5.12 and 5.14, though nothing is noted in perl5140delta.

      perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'
[reply]
        Thanks!

        I browsed thru various perldelta513* w/o spotting it.

        For those interested here a one-liner for testing your perl-version:

        lanx@nc10-ubuntu:~$ perl -e '@k=( %h=(a=>42,b=>2,a=>1) ); print "$] Bu
+g: @k\n" unless @k ~~ [%h]'
5.010000 Bug: b 2 b 2

        [download]

        I'll gonna update a non-smartmatch solution here...

        UPDATE:

        w/o smart-match for even older perl versions (maybe the bug was introduced somewhere)

        lanx@nc10-ubuntu:~$ perl -e '%h2=@k=( %h=(a=>42,b=>2,a=>1) ); delete @
+h{keys %h2}; print "$] Bug: @k\n" if %h'
5.010000 Bug: b 2 b 2

        [download]

        Cheers Rolf

        UPDATE: replace version-vars s'$^V'$]'g in code-sections

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]
Re^2: return of assigment in list context (bug?)
by perl514 (Pilgrim) on Jan 02, 2013 at 18:24 UTC

    Hi

    Kindly let me know which OS you are using

    Perlpetually Indebted To PerlMonks

    Win 7 at Work. Living through it....Linux at home. Loving it.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom