Re^3: Evolving a faster filter?

So there's no way to tell how many objects a filter will take out until the filter was run?

Comment on Re^3: Evolving a faster filter?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Evolving a faster filter? by Ovid (Cardinal) on Jan 06, 2013 at 21:09 UTC
Unfortunately, that is correct. Trying to find the fastest ordering isn't deterministic. We need a "generally fastest" ordering and we'll have to understand how to handle worst-case scenarios when we have real-world data. Cheers, Ovid Live and work anywhere in the world. The official Perl 6 wiki.	[reply]