Re^4: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)

Thanks a lot for your explanation. I really appreciate it :)

Sub::Name, on cpan has a 4 open bugs, I looked through them and I'm assuming that it should be ok to use it if I were distributing my wrapper as a module?

Comment on Re^4: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?) by tobyink (Canon) on Jan 19, 2013 at 18:45 UTC
Obviously it's up to you to judge whether it's suitably stable, but Moose and DBIx::Class both use Sub::Name, so personally I'd consider it to be pretty reliable. `perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'`	[reply]
Re^6: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?) by gideondsouza (Pilgrim) on Jan 20, 2013 at 05:25 UTC
Thanks. That more than convinces me	[reply]