in reply to Re: Test::More how come?
in thread Test::More how come?

Sure, but don't you think the second test should PASS? have i made some really simple mistake but just can't see it??

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Test::More how come?
by keszler (Priest) on Jan 30, 2013 at 17:24 UTC
Re^3: Test::More how come?
by thmsdrew (Scribe) on Jan 30, 2013 at 17:26 UTC

    It'll work if you use eq instead of ==.

      I get it - it's an FP precision thing. Thanks.
Re^3: Test::More how come?
by tmharish (Friar) on Jan 30, 2013 at 17:20 UTC