in reply to Re: Redefining Imported Subs: of scope and no
in thread Redefining Imported Subs: of scope and no

...

Hit the reply link, the reply link, the link that says reply to reply to the post you want to reply to , that is the link you're supposed to click to have threaded discussion, otherwise it is not theaded discussion but a flat list, flat lists are not effective for following a conversation, that is why the twitts and other "chats" use the @username stuff, so click the reply link and its like this isn't some chat and not flat at all...

As to your question, CORE is CORE::, many threads about CORE::, ex::override

perl -e " CORE::say 1 ; "
perl -e " CORE::say 1 ; say 2 "
perl -E " CORE::say 1 ; say 2 "

  • Comment on Re^2: Redefining Imported Subs: of scope and no

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Redefining Imported Subs: of scope and no
by LanX (Saint) on Feb 09, 2013 at 22:09 UTC
    > Hit the reply link, the reply link, the link that says reply to reply to the post you want to reply to , that is the link you're supposed to click to have threaded discussion, otherwise it is not theaded discussion but a flat list, flat lists are not effective for following a conversation, that is why the twitts and other "chats" use the @username stuff, so click the reply link and its like this isn't some chat and not flat at all...

    Great hip hop ... I'd love to see a XKCD referencing this song! =)

    Cheers Rolf

Re^3: Redefining Imported Subs: of scope and no
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 09, 2013 at 21:48 UTC
    Say::Compat - Backwards compatibility wrapper for say()