Re: Dear Moose docs...

Your rant would be much better placed in Moose's bug tracker, preferrably with a patch attached that improves the docs. Then those people who actually work on Moose would read it, not us "innocent bystanders".

And it would have the advantage of possibly having a positive effect.

Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

Comment on Re: Dear Moose docs...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Dear Moose docs... by Anonymous Monk on Feb 10, 2013 at 09:25 UTC
Your rant would be much better placed in Moose's bug tracker, preferrably with a patch attached that improves the docs. How would OP write a patch when OP didn't know the answer?	[reply]
Re^3: Dear Moose docs... by LanX (Saint) on Feb 10, 2013 at 12:54 UTC
> How would OP write a patch when OP didn't know the answer? Asking here, but friendly and constructive and w/o ranting. Free software depends on collaboration and not on a "I want my money back" attitude. Cheers Rolf	[reply]
Re^3: Dear Moose docs... by moritz (Cardinal) on Feb 10, 2013 at 10:27 UTC
The OP could have started reading the Moose test suite to find out, or any working example code in the wild that uses Moose. But I don't always expect this level from involvement, which is why I wrote "prefferably", to make it clear it's not a requirement. Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed	[reply]