Re: Can a new name or version number change the way Perl is perceived?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Can a new name or version number change the way Perl is perceived? by Anonymous Monk on Feb 15, 2013 at 17:47 UTC
Ok, I've read it now, #!/usr/bin/pumpkin could work if done shiny enough, like all rebrandings Althought, none have mentioned perl5² or #!/usr/bin/perl25	[reply]
Re^3: Can a new name or version number change the way Perl is perceived? by Anonymous Monk on Feb 15, 2013 at 17:48 UTC
#!/usr/bin/pumpkin could work if done shiny enough, like all rebrandings And by competent marketing manager, not programmers	[reply]
Re^4: Can a new name or version number change the way Perl is perceived? by ww (Archbishop) on Feb 15, 2013 at 18:01 UTC
"competent marketing manager" It might work in those circumstances, assuming there's ALSO sufficient advancement from the the last-previous 5.0nn to minimize/discredit reactions such as "same old, same old; just new marketing!" If you didn't program your executable by toggling in binary, it wasn't really programming!	[reply]