Re: XMLin question

Is there a way to get around this error?

Yes, fix your xml so it is xml because as it is written now it doesn't qualify for xml, it is broken, any < > in content needs to be escaped, but you knew that already, its FAQ after all

Comment on Re: XMLin question

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: XMLin question by Anonymous Monk on Feb 15, 2013 at 17:52 UTC
XML::LibXML::Fixup - apply regexes to XML to fix validation and parsing errors	[reply]
Re^2: XMLin question by stryda42 (Novice) on Feb 15, 2013 at 17:58 UTC
Ok, thank you I was curious if there was some way to auto-convert < to < as well as tags like this in general instead of manually doing this, from an end user perspective.	[reply]
Re^3: XMLin question by Anonymous Monk on Feb 15, 2013 at 18:19 UTC
I was curious if there was some way to auto-convert < to < as well as tags like this in general instead of manually doing this, from an end user perspective. :\| You don't say :/ `perl -pe "%f = qw{ < < > > }; s{[^><]\K([><])([^\w])}{ $f{$1}$2} +g; " < in > out` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: XMLin question by Anonymous Monk on Feb 15, 2013 at 18:21 UTC
naturally, untested, doesn't work :/	[reply]
Re^5: XMLin question by bart (Canon) on Feb 15, 2013 at 22:25 UTC
Re^6: XMLin question by Anonymous Monk on Feb 15, 2013 at 22:43 UTC