in reply to Re: any way to fill calling namespace with a "use Module"?
in thread any way to fill calling namespace with a "use Module"?
Wow! I didn't think of using BUILD that way. That's exactly what I'm looking for. (I'll write an experiment for this) Do you have to invoke use SubordinateA; use SubordinateB; in the invoking environment or ??? I suppose I can work around that...
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: any way to fill calling namespace with a "use Module"?
by tobyink (Canon) on Feb 23, 2013 at 22:54 UTC |