in reply to Re^3: counting backward (optimize foreach reverse low .. high
in thread counting backward

You're wrong
  • Comment on Re^4: counting backward (optimize foreach reverse low .. high

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: counting backward (optimize foreach reverse low .. high
by LanX (Saint) on Mar 02, 2013 at 15:56 UTC

      Maybe it's optimized for reversing arrays but not for reversing ranges:

      Kind of why I suggested optimizing it for ranges also

      Nice try , but you're still wrong

      You sais But in for(reverse @f ) there is no for-context which helps reverse to act differently.

      That has nothing to do with ranges, and its still wrong