Re: Re: Perl Builder 2.0

I tried a recent version of Komodo on a tired old Pentium 90. My advice -> get a fast box if you want this beast to run in real time - the performance was so bad you could simply not use it. This same box runs Perl Builder 2 no problem.

One note, scripts run in PB2 run about 100 times slower than from the command line. This is not an issue in most cases but can be for computationally intensive tasks. Easy enough to run stuff from the command prompt anyway, even while you are editing them in PB2.

cheers

tachyon

s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print

Comment on Re: Re: Perl Builder 2.0

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Perl Builder 2.0 by TStanley (Canon) on Aug 04, 2001 at 10:44 UTC
I noticed that to. This machine is a P2 Celeron-333 Mhz, with 32MB RAM, and it was slower than molasses. The other downside I noticed is that you had to download their ActivePython as well, since the IDE was written in Python. TStanley -------- There's an infinite number of monkeys outside who want to talk to us about this script for Hamlet they've worked out -- Douglas Adams/Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Perl Builder 2.0 by tachyon (Chancellor) on Aug 04, 2001 at 14:29 UTC
Hmm a PII 333 is no slouch, I wonder how fast a machine and how much memory you need to get it to hum? I guess it demonstrates the advantages of C/C++ for application development. Some of the text editors on the outside links are also slow as a wet week. cheers tachyon s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print	[reply]