in reply to Re^2: SQLite vs Firebird vs ...
in thread SQLite vs Firebird vs ...

SQLite really sucks "SQL-wise".

SQLite rules for what it is: an utterly free, stable, embeddable, minimalistic engine. Saying it sucks because it doesn't match your use case is like saying a saw sucks because it won't drive nails well.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: SQLite vs Firebird vs ...
by sedusedan (Pilgrim) on Mar 13, 2013 at 03:00 UTC
    I was actually saying "SQLite's SQL features sucks (as in: are lacking)". To be more specific: no dates, very limited ALTER TABLE. Is that more objective now? (Although now that I think of it, those two lacking features are crippling *for my use cases*, others might not be bothered with that).
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom