sigil
by da (Friar) on Aug 06, 2001 at 07:38 UTC
|
If the proper name for %, $, @, and * are sigils, I suspect polysigilant is a more proper term for what you describe, even though it's more of a mouthful than polysignet.
I suggest polytypic.
As to whether it's a good idea to do it, I really prefer my variables to be self-documenting all the way through the code, and it seems an unneccessary shortcut. If I did it, it probably would lead to confusion down the road.
Update: I'm not able to come up with the origin of the word sigil, but I first saw it in Damian Conway's Exegesis 2, and I know the term is used by gnat and japhy.
___
-DA
> perl -MPOSIX -e'$ENV{TZ}="US/Eastern";print ctime(10**9)'
Sat Sep 8 21:46:40 2001
| [reply] [d/l] |
|
|
Says [da]:
I'm not able to come up with the origin of the word sigil, but I first saw it in Damian Conway's Exegesis 2,
and I know the term is used by gnat and japhy.
The term 'sigil' to mean the funny character at the front of a Perl variable
was coined on 3 March 1999 by Philip Gwyn. I immediately posted
about it to p5p:
The source code actually uses the term `funny characters' to refer to
the $@%*& characters that select the variable type. This terminology
leaves a lot to be desired, but until now, I'd never heard a better
suggestion. They don't really have a good name. This has sometimes
been a problem for me when I've written documentation. The temptation
is to pretend that the funny character is part of the variable name,
which it isn't.
Philip Gwyn just used the word `sigil'. This struck me as a really
wonderful coinage that shouldn't be lost. The spelling of `sigil'
suggests `sign', which is good, and the word doesn't presently have
any other meaning in the Perl context, also good.
Glancing over man pages like `perldata' I can see a lot of places
where the explanations would become simpler or more accurate if the
word `sigil' were used.
Finally, according to the dictionary here, it means:
A sign or image considered magical.
Which is a really perfect description of it.
The term started catching on right away, and has gradually gained popularity.
| [reply] |
|
|
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
| [reply] |
Re: Nomenclature
by spudzeppelin (Pilgrim) on Aug 06, 2001 at 18:21 UTC
|
Which of course to me sounds like polycygnant, or "having multiple swans." The pond by my house, for example, is polycygnant.
Of course, I suppose we could (if we're really trying to conjure up as much confusion as possible) overload THAT word as well: suppose a polycygnant variable is one that has multiple attributes; it's not totally out of line: attribute ~ albatross (worn around the variable's neck) ~ swan (another large white aquatic bird).
Of course, this babble is brought to you by the virus (in the microbial, not digital sense) I contracted yesterday, so take it FWIW.
Spud Zeppelin * spud@spudzeppelin.com
| [reply] |
|
|
| [reply] |