in reply to Re^5: using bits to print part of a string (Bitops win by an order of magnitude)
in thread using bits to print part of a string

Ok, ok, ok, now I know why you kicked it out. ;-)

Anyway, thank you for giving it a try. The only thing I've seen for improvment is to build the regex like some of the other solutions, so not every hit character is a regex pattern, but consecutive characters build one regex.

Investigating this rises a point of criticism in your benchmark: You don't have one mask for all tests. And the way some solutions depend on the pattern of the mask has an influence on the performance, e.g. Think of the substrref solution with a pattern '1' x 400_000.

Have a nice sunday
McA

  • Comment on Re^6: using bits to print part of a string (Bitops win by an order of magnitude)
  • Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: using bits to print part of a string (Bitops win by an order of magnitude)
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 17, 2013 at 10:20 UTC
    You don't have one mask for all tests.

    Sorry, but you are mistaken. The srand $S ensures that the same mask is built for each run.

    You can change it using sommand line arg -S=nn, but so long as you use the same value for each run (1 by default) then the same mask will be generated for each test.

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

      Hi BrowserUk,

      I've to admit that you're right. The only thing which gives me consolation: The other readers can see now explicitly that you thought about that too. :-)

      Best regards
      McA

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom