Re: Unexpected behavior when using PDL::IO::Misc::rcols with $PDL::undefval

Back when I made this post, I never got around to reporting the bug. I installed the new PDL 2.006 yesterday and the problem persisted, so I reported the bug (and surprisingly less than 24 hours later) the fix is in the git repository.

Just thought I would note this here in the event that someone stumbles upon this node.

See this blog post to see what's new in PDL 2.006.

Comment on Re: Unexpected behavior when using PDL::IO::Misc::rcols with $PDL::undefval

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Unexpected behavior when using PDL::IO::Misc::rcols with $PDL::undefval by etj (Priest) on May 22, 2022 at 17:58 UTC
Note from THE FUTURE: these days, PDL lives on GitHub, so the best link for that commit is now https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl/commit/30257deb515e1d273414f68ceea2b3e58a05d1e0. But mostly, thank you for reporting bugs! It makes the world a better place (or at least, makes that more probable ;-).	[reply]
Re^2: Unexpected behavior when using PDL::IO::Misc::rcols with $PDL::undefval by syphilis (Archbishop) on Mar 25, 2013 at 01:55 UTC
I reported the bug (and surprisingly less than 24 hours later) the fix is in the git repository You shouldn't be surprised by that - there are a few guys over there who are typically very responsive. Unfortunately, they're not usually hanging around the monastery. Cheers, Rob	[reply]