Re: WWW::Curl::Easy slower than LWP on POSTs (RESOLVED)

Question: Old post, but have you tried comparing WWW::Curl to just using back ticks to capture/call curl?

Demize

Comment on Re: WWW::Curl::Easy slower than LWP on POSTs (RESOLVED)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: WWW::Curl::Easy slower than LWP on POSTs (RESOLVED) by mje (Curate) on Mar 27, 2013 at 16:05 UTC
No I didn't. Are you suggesting you think it is quicker?	[reply]
Re^3: WWW::Curl::Easy slower than LWP on POSTs (RESOLVED) by deMize (Monk) on Mar 29, 2013 at 05:37 UTC
Not suggesting. I have no idea and was hoping you'd find out. Demize	[reply]