batch 'use' possible?

exilepanda has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Hi monks,

Recently I am writing lot of CGI scripts and I've quite boring to start every new script by the same 10 more use statement for calling the same sort of modules. Is that possible to use My::StandardStarter;(for example) and My::StandardStarter will help me to load the same sort of modules so I don't need to repeat those use statement from time to time ?

Comment on batch 'use' possible? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: batch 'use' possible? (perl5.pm Toolset.pm, Syntax::Collector , Toolkit.pm, rig.pm, sitecustomize.pl, PERL5OPT )( load multiple commonly-used favorite modules in a single import expression ) by Anonymous Monk on May 09, 2013 at 03:46 UTC
perl5, perl5::ingy ToolSet Syntax::Collector Toolkit rig see perlrun#PERL5OPT , PERLLIB, PERL5LIB sitecustomize under perlrun#* f* how to make lexical pragma global, hints ( pl_hints $^H %^H ), taint::all	[reply]
Re^2: batch 'use' possible? (perl5.pm Toolset.pm, Syntax::Collector , Toolkit.pm, rig.pm, sitecustomize.pl, PERL5OPT )( load multiple commonly-used favorite modules in a single import expression ) by exilepanda (Friar) on May 09, 2013 at 05:46 UTC
BIG THANKS! Thaz what I am looking for! Works perfectly! =)	[reply]
Re^3: batch 'use' possible? (perl5.pm Toolset.pm, Syntax::Collector , Toolkit.pm, rig.pm, sitecustomize.pl, PERL5OPT )( load multiple commonly-used favorite modules in a single import expression ) by Anonymous Monk on May 09, 2013 at 06:49 UTC
BIG THANKS! Thaz what I am looking for! Works perfectly! =) Which one did you use?	[reply]
Re: batch 'use' possible? by GrandFather (Saint) on May 09, 2013 at 03:45 UTC
Have you tried it? Did it work? Did it take more or less time trying it out for yourself than it did to write up your question and wait for an answer? True laziness is hard work	[reply]
Re^2: batch 'use' possible? by exilepanda (Friar) on May 09, 2013 at 05:05 UTC
Honestly I didn't try it, as I perceived this is kind of syntactical issue that I don't know how to write that "line". I want to google, but I don't even know how to call this in a proper term. But after all, I think I should mention this within my original post. Thanks for point out	[reply]