in reply to Re^3: Possible for Map to create Hash of Hash?
in thread Possible for Map to create Hash of Hash?

.. Anyway, you can ask topic starter why he need split, while he just needs to

I'm sorry, but you've missed my point :) I am questioning the wisdom of your suggestion for an alternative approach.

Since OP already decided on a hash-of-hashes, why switch back to a simple hash? Or hash-of-array-?emulation?

Why throw away the benefits of easy lookup?

There has to be some benefit to doing it differently; and few drawbacks

  • Comment on Re^4: Possible for Map to create Hash of Hash?