in reply to Re^5: sprintf %X endianness
in thread sprintf %X endianness

*sign* Is what "thing"? Cos in the OP you wrote:"00021401", but in this post you wrote: 00204110 twice. Which should I take as being your requirement?

I laid out my question in the OP. You ignored it, and then I typoed. I don't have a different machine to test if sprintf %x does the same thing on all machines.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: sprintf %X endianness
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 15, 2013 at 02:43 UTC
    You ignored it,

    I did not ignore it. I used an example that more clearly demonstrates the process.

    and then I typoed.

    How am I supposed to distinguish which is the typo?

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]

      I did not ignore it. I used an example that more clearly demonstrates the process.

      Well, I kind of asked a yes/or no question, and then I got lost in your answer.

      On third look just use it and the code will do the right thing. seems to answer that sprintf %x will return the same string on all machines

      How am I supposed to distinguish which is the typo?

      I don't think you are, I kind of think I pointed out what I wanted when I when I realized I made the typo

      Thanks

[reply]
        seems to answer that sprintf %x will return the same string on all machines

        Yes.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom