Re^2: Parallel ForkManager error with run_on_wait() (in 10 year old version)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Parallel ForkManager error with run_on_wait() (in 10 year old version) by Anonymous Monk on May 16, 2013 at 14:23 UTC
I downloaded and viewed the source How about you try running the code?	[reply]
Re^4: Parallel ForkManager error with run_on_wait() (in 10 year old version) by sojourn548 (Acolyte) on May 16, 2013 at 14:47 UTC
Yes, testing it, and waiting to see if I get the same error.. It'll take a week or two to see if the process exits abnormally.	[reply]
Re^4: Parallel ForkManager error with run_on_wait() (in 10 year old version) by sojourn548 (Acolyte) on May 20, 2013 at 21:03 UTC
Installed and tested with the Parallel ForkManager version 1.03 the code is still exiting abnormally in the same section of ForkManager.pm: `Use of uninitialized value in block exit at /lib/site_perl/5.8.9/Paral +lel/ForkManager.pm line 599. Use of uninitialized value in block exit at /lib/site_perl/5.8.9/Paral +lel/ForkManager.pm line 599. Unable to create sub named "" at /lib/site_perl/5.8.9/Parallel/ForkMan +ager.pm line 599.` [download] `587 sub run_on_wait { 588 my ($s,$code, $period)=@_; 589 590 $s->{on_wait}=$code; 591 $s->{on_wait_period} = $period; 592 } 593 594 sub on_wait { 595 my ($s)=@_; 596 597 if(ref($s->{on_wait}) eq 'CODE') { 598 $s->{on_wait}->(); 599 if (defined $s->{on_wait_period}) { 600 local $SIG{CHLD} = sub { } if ! defined $SIG{CHLD}; 601 select undef, undef, undef, $s->{on_wait_period} 602 }; 603 }; 604 };` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Parallel ForkManager error with run_on_wait() (in 10 year old version) by Anonymous Monk on Dec 12, 2013 at 06:45 UTC
I have the same problem with both the old (0.7.5) and new (1.05) version of ForkManager. Obvious, the line numbers for the new version is different, so I get the following written to STDERR: `Use of uninitialized value in block exit at .../perl5/Parallel/ForkMan +ager.pm line 601. Unable to create sub named "" at .../perl5/Parallel/ForkManager.pm lin +e 601.` [download] So, yes, the problem persists in hte new code. All hints/help is more than welcome, /Bjarne	[reply] [d/l]