in reply to Re: Maximum down-votes per monk/day
in thread Maximum down-votes per monk/day
Hi! Anonymous Monk here again.
To those of you who've upvoted the above comment, thank you! I assume you did so because you understood it to be telling someone to be nice. (And shouldn't we all be nice?)
Unfortunately for me, Anonymous Monk, I now realize that my earlier statements have major flaws. In fact, there are so many obvious flaws that I feel like I must have been a different person when I wrote the comment above.
Anyway, dear upvoters, I'm sure that by my last sentence, where I, in my role of goody-goody objective authority, call upon the OP to use rationality as the basis of discourse, you were sure and certain that I had made a stand for civility against the evil forces of strong opinion and should be endorsed accordingly. Again, I thank you.
But now I address those who didn't upvote me. I ask that you forgive me, Anonymous Monk, for crafting such a mistaken, sanctimonious, supercilious and illogical chastisement that must seem to have been crafted by a pretentious lackwit truckling to the politically correct "don't use words that can possibly offend anyone" crowd. I promise you that in the future, I, Anonymous Monk will do better.
... and, alas, worse.
(Maybe I should increase my lithium dosage?)
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: Maximum down-votes per monk/day
by LanX (Saint) on May 19, 2013 at 00:53 UTC | |
Re^3: Maximum down-votes per monk/day
by Anonymous Monk on May 19, 2013 at 20:17 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on May 21, 2013 at 01:59 UTC |