Re^3: OT: xml format question (offtopic!)

Adding "OT" does not make an off-topic question better. If it has no relevance to Perl, you need to give more justification why it is posted on a site named Perlmonks.

Coldfusion is far outside of that, unless you need to talk to it from Perl, for example.

Comment on Re^3: OT: xml format question (offtopic!)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: OT: xml format question (offtopic!) by flexvault (Monsignor) on May 24, 2013 at 10:55 UTC
Corion, I considered that other monks wouldn't be interested in a coldfusion to Perl question, so I marked it with 'OT:' and clicked 'create'. It was the error message that I got about violating PM rules that was the surprise. I removed the 'OT:' and the thread was accepted, which I considered strange. But, I'm not interested in 'CF' :-) Regards...Ed "Well done is better than well said." - Benjamin Franklin	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: OT: xml format question (offtopic!)
by flexvault (Monsignor) on May 24, 2013 at 10:55 UTC

Corion,

I considered that other monks wouldn't be interested in a coldfusion to Perl question, so I marked it with 'OT:' and clicked 'create'. It was the error message that I got about violating PM rules that was the surprise. I removed the 'OT:' and the thread was accepted, which I considered strange.

But, I'm not interested in 'CF' :-)

Regards...Ed

"Well done is better than well said." - Benjamin Franklin

[reply]