in reply to Re: multi threading
in thread multi threading

This is really the approach I wanted to take, dividing the list and having simultaneous processes handle the smaller lists in parallel, then merging the results at the end. I thought (apparently incorrectly) that threads were the way to do this

I'm extremely new to this kind of programming so if there's any more insight or a good reference you could point me to about using child processes that would be really helpful. With my computing resource I have plentiful cores and memory to be used, but I'm not sure about disk reading capabilities, so my instinct was to find a way to just break it up and use more cores. It sounds like this is what you did just in a better way than I was planning to

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: multi threading
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 04, 2013 at 04:59 UTC
    I thought (apparently incorrectly) that threads were the way to do this

    This shows a method that might be adaptable to your task. But then again, maybe not.

    Had you ever supplied the requested information, you might have gotten a more definitive answer.


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.