in reply to Re^3: Explicit package name Warning!!!
in thread Explicit package name Warning!!!

Can you clarify:

(not needed with 5.16 and higher)

I am running Strawberry Perl 5.16.3 and I do not get any trouble with undeclared variables unless I use strict;

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Explicit package name Warning!!!
by ww (Archbishop) on Jun 05, 2013 at 14:04 UTC
    Can't say whether my hasty comment is applicable to Strawberry's implementation, but, clarifying and correcting the parenthetical statement at least with respect to my flavor (ActiveState):

    (not needed with 5.016 and higher if the script includes the line use 5.01n; where n is a relevant decimal digit)


    If you didn't program your executable by toggling in binary, it wasn't really programming!

      Thanks for the clarification, that does the trick.