in reply to RFC: Code testers/reviewers needed
It sounds like you are looking more for a code review, not a tester. If that is the case, you may get more responses with a different title.
If that is the case, post the code here, within <readmore><code>...</code></readmore> tags. PerlMonks seems to prefer having posts fairly well self contained, in order to allow for the content to be long lived.
That being said, I would probably start your options gathering with Getopt::Long or something similar. Prompting the user is not necessarily a bad thing, but not allowing for automation is (imo). That is all the further I got at this point.
--MidLifeXis
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: RFC: Script testers needed (ITYM code review)
by AI Cowboy (Beadle) on Jun 06, 2013 at 17:00 UTC |