in reply to RFC: Code testers/reviewers needed

It sounds like you are looking more for a code review, not a tester. If that is the case, you may get more responses with a different title.

If that is the case, post the code here, within <readmore><code>...</code></readmore> tags. PerlMonks seems to prefer having posts fairly well self contained, in order to allow for the content to be long lived.

That being said, I would probably start your options gathering with Getopt::Long or something similar. Prompting the user is not necessarily a bad thing, but not allowing for automation is (imo). That is all the further I got at this point.

--MidLifeXis

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Script testers needed (ITYM code review)
by AI Cowboy (Beadle) on Jun 06, 2013 at 17:00 UTC

    I was actually planning on making this able to take arguments from the command line in a later version - but thanks for pointing out Getopt::Long! That looks like it's a really useful module.

    I also took your advice and posted the code here on the post, for everyone to view within the Monastery. Hope that helps!