in reply to Re: Rand() with ?log10? distribution? (math)
in thread Rand() with ?log10? distribution?

Thanks.

I didn't use this because: I couldn't work out how to set an upper limit; and the two-factor tuning is quite difficult, relative to the single factor tuning of primos solution.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
  • Comment on Re^2: Rand() with ?log10? distribution? (math)

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom