in reply to Re^5: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
in thread using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)

But so are most of the active Perlmonks and as one Monk's consideration alone cannot do much, you get automatically an "average" opinion on these issues, which --I assume-- will be very much in line with what the gods think.

Consideration sets the tone, its the most important part of the process

See Re: Small Perl quests for a beginner? Considered: jdporter: reap. spam.

and see what tye says on consideration Re^3: swissprot assignment (worth), Re^5: swissprot assignment (effort), Re^7: swissprot assignment (effort)

Even monks tend to assume that those who consider nodes have done their due dilligence

Consider Reaped: Re^5: Should I list core modules as dependencies? and what LanX says about it in Re: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider) , his bias clouds his judgment

  • Comment on Re^6: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
by jdporter (Paladin) on Jun 09, 2013 at 01:41 UTC
    See Re: Small Perl quests for a beginner? Considered: jdporter: reap. spam.

    I freely admit that was a mistake. I judged, and acted, too hastily. Immediately after I submitted for consideration, I upvoted the node and voted Keep. :-)

    I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
[reply]
Re^7: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
by CountZero (Bishop) on Jun 08, 2013 at 10:53 UTC
    I am not saying the consideration system if fail-proof, but I still prefer having it over not having it or revoking consideration powers from *some* by a decision of gods or handing reaping powers only to a select *few*.

    CountZero

    A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

    My blog: Imperial Deltronics
[reply]

      I am not saying the consideration system if fail-proof, but I still prefer having it over not having it or revoking consideration powers from *some* by a decision of gods or handing reaping powers only to a select *few*.

      Remember /borg ? There is no reason for the losing of power to consider to be permanent

[reply]
        Borging is an answer to an entirely different issue. And it is used very very sparingly.

        Since the consideration system is not broken, or not even considered a problem by the Monastery, I tend to go by the "Don't repair it, if it ain't broken" maxim.

        Allow me to ask you a more personal question: you seem genuinely interested in the good working of the Monastery. Why don't you join us and post under your own identity?

        CountZero

        A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

        My blog: Imperial Deltronics
[reply]
Re^7: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
by choroba (Cardinal) on Jun 08, 2013 at 10:57 UTC
    My node is a bad example: Reap 1, Keep 6, +2 votes at the moment.
    لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ
[reply]

      My node is a bad example: Reap 1, Keep 6, +2 votes at the moment.

      What do you think its an example of?

      I think it is an example of a bad consideration , one that should not have been made, a very fresh consideration -- there have been more, but I don't keep track and its not like I can search for them

[reply]
        But, as you can see, other Monks corrected the original considerator.
        لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion