Re: (Toward a better PerlMonks) Who do we serve, and why, and how can we do it better?

So far as I know, PerlMonks is the only forum that provides a means of negative feedback

I find this an incredible claim. You've already posted not once, but twice, and at length, on the evils of downvoting:

There were responses to your posts that mentioned sites with downvotes, such as Slashdot, Stack Overflow, reddit and hacker news. There was a response that refuted your claim that geocaching does not permit negative feedback (which you did not respond to). Finally, you yourself in a reply quoted that on Stack Overflow:

Downvotes remove 2 reputation from the post author

Had you bothered to do a small amount of research before posting for a third time on this topic, you would have easily discovered sites that provide a means of negative feedback.

Comment on Re: (Toward a better PerlMonks) Who do we serve, and why, and how can we do it better?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: (Toward a better PerlMonks) Who do we serve, and why, and how can we do it better? by LanX (Saint) on Jun 11, 2013 at 14:28 UTC
Come on, you should better cherish the positive aspects! At least a troll who doesn't pretend to be ignorant. Cheers Rolf ( addicted to the Perl Programming Language) PS: Nevertheless: Don't feed! =)	[reply]