in reply to (tye)Re: The vexation of installing and compiling HTML::CalendarMonth
in thread The vexation of installing and compiling HTML::CalendarMonth

Yes. Oversite on my part. It used to be that way, but it's been dropped.

Do you happen to know, right of hand, whether that syntax ordains an exact match on the version requirement, or is it a >= relationship. If it's an exact match, that might have been why I dropped it once upon a time.

Matt

  • Comment on Re: (tye)Re: The vexation of installing and compiling HTML::CalendarMonth

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(tye)Re2: The vexation of installing and compiling HTML::CalendarMonth
by tye (Sage) on Aug 12, 2001 at 21:48 UTC

    Yes, both of those request that version or newer.

            - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")