in reply to Re: Is PM more active or less active than X years ago?
in thread Is PM more active or less active than X years ago?

You bring up an interesting point, which is the question of relative traffic vs absolute traffic.

We can easily answer the question of absolute traffic.

However, let's say traffic is down. Part of that, as you say, may be because of a lapse in popularity of Perl.

However, what part of this is due to competition for what Perl related traffic there still is, like with StackOverflow, etc

Again, this is anecdotal, but I feel like before, when I googled perl problems, the majority of the results were on PM. These days, I believe a slim majority of the results now come from Stackoverflow.

  • Comment on Re^2: Is PM more active or less active than X years ago?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is PM more active or less active than X years ago?
by 5mi11er (Deacon) on Jul 06, 2013 at 13:57 UTC
    Anecdotally, I've found that StackOverflow answers are no where near the quality I'm looking for, so I tend to seek out perl monks answers from my google searches, or just come straight here and do some super searches.

    -Scott

Re^3: Is PM more active or less active than X years ago?
by marto (Cardinal) on Jul 05, 2013 at 21:35 UTC

    Curious, I supposed at least part of that be that Stackexchange either didn't exist yet, or had much fewer posts?