Re: Functionality to automatically insert <readmore> tags into long posts?

> What do you think?

I can think of many automation things which might make sense.

Automatic paragraphs or a heuristics to sense and warn unmarked code for instanceš.

But the decision is of an economic nature, does it save more work than it causes?

The amount of considerations mentioning "readmore" or "code" might be in indicator...

OTOH there are certainly many features here in the settings whose profit/maintenance factor is far to small.

Anyway if you personally want this readmore feature, using a nodelet-hack should easily do it for you.

Cheers Rolf

( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

š) "did you forget code-tags?"

Comment on Re: Functionality to automatically insert <readmore> tags into long posts?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Functionality to automatically insert <readmore> tags into long posts? by Loops (Curate) on Jul 05, 2013 at 20:05 UTC
This feature wouldn't be a huge improvement or anything, just help alleviate one small annoyance. So in that sense it's hard to justify much investment in it. However, it does affect all visitors many/most of whom wont employ a nodelet-hack and will thus have slightly less positive experience.	[reply]
Re^3: Functionality to automatically insert <readmore> tags into long posts? by LanX (Saint) on Jul 05, 2013 at 20:11 UTC
maybe a misunderstanding, a nodelet hack to fold long posts of other monks, not one that includes `<readmore>` tags into your own replies. Cheers Rolf ( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Functionality to automatically insert <readmore> tags into long posts? by Loops (Curate) on Jul 05, 2013 at 20:15 UTC
Yeah, got that and was arguing that it didn't offer a general enough solution. Casual visitors wouldn't get any benefit from a nodelet-hack that solved it just for me	[reply]