Re^6: threads::shared seems to kill performance (Workaround).

Wow, this is quite something. I'm trying to absorb all that and I have probably a very stupid question at the beginning - what is threads::Q? I can't find that on CPAN or anywhere else.

Comment on Re^6: threads::shared seems to kill performance (Workaround).

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: threads::shared seems to kill performance (Workaround). by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 19, 2013 at 16:38 UTC
what is threads::Q? I can't find that on CPAN or anywhere else. Its a module of my own writing that I've never packaged. It is essentially my own version of Thread::Queue minus a lot of that modules junk, plus a little extra. Namely, you specify a size for the queue and it self limits to that size, blocking senders when it gets to full and receivers when empty. You can grab a copy of it here. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^7: threads::shared seems to kill performance (Workaround).
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 19, 2013 at 16:38 UTC

what is threads::Q? I can't find that on CPAN or anywhere else.

Its a module of my own writing that I've never packaged.

It is essentially my own version of Thread::Queue minus a lot of that modules junk, plus a little extra. Namely, you specify a size for the queue and it self limits to that size, blocking senders when it gets to full and receivers when empty.

You can grab a copy of it here.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

[reply]