in reply to Problem with Class::Accessor::Faster

Thanks for the replies, I misinterpreted the fact that faster used arrayrefs internally instead of hashrefs to mean that on the exterior the modules would act the same. Thanks for the clarifications, unfortunately though I think that the time I will save by switching would be offset by the time it would take to rewrite the modules. In the future though, I think I will switch to faster.

I will apply the patch mentioned as well, thanks for that.

  • Comment on Re: Problem with Class::Accessor::Faster