in reply to Thought I'd Give it a Shot

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: Thought I'd Give it a Shot
by cciulla (Friar) on May 07, 2000 at 04:24 UTC
    Once again, someone who would rather snipe anonymously rather than contributue.

    Personally, I thought it was pretty cool, and, as such, it got one of my votes.

    Keep up the good work, reptile.

RE: RE: Thought I'd Give it a Shot
by ZZamboni (Curate) on May 07, 2000 at 09:00 UTC
    One of the nicest things about PerlMonks is that it is the friendliest Perl forum I have ever seen, where you can freely share your ideas and your code. I hope this kind of aggressivity doesn't become the norm. It would be a shame.

    If you are going to attack like that, you should at least be brave enough to identify yourself.

RE: RE: Thought I'd Give it a Shot
by BBQ (Curate) on May 08, 2000 at 02:43 UTC
    Sincerely, an Anonymous Monk that spits out a comment like that towards someone else was probably conceived knowing perl, java, fortran, cobol, pascal, c, ada95, basic, lisp, python and nuclear physics. One must really have to think highly of himself to be able to slash out like that at a perfectly good 1st try at obfuscation.

    I'll admit its pretty readable, but it IS a 1st try and its not THAT easy to read. Keep 'em coming reptile, you have my vote! You'll get the swing of it...

    Maybe vroom should include an Anonymous Coward user since it seems some bad slashdotters are visiting our little perl monastery.
RE: RE: Thought I'd Give it a Shot (kudra: anon flames have their uses)
by kudra (Vicar) on May 08, 2000 at 12:11 UTC
    With the amount of support following one anon flame, it could almost be tempting to anon flame yourself ;)

    ...I'm not serious. I just wish I could give minus votes to anon postings.