in reply to Persistence for options?
Hey, nice can of worms you opened here toma!
So here is a summary of what we've got so far. Let me know if you feel like adding more module/options or other fields:
| Module | Format | In core | Notes |
| Storable | binary | X | fast |
| Data::Dumper | text | X | widely used, need to eval the output to reload it |
| Data::Denter | text | plug-in replacement for Data::Dumper | |
| XML::Simple | XML | ||
| Data::DumpXML | XML | more complete than XML::Dumper | |
| XML::Dumper | XML | simpler than Data::DumpXML | |
| hash tied to a DB_File | binary | X | |
| AnyData | various | can use CSV, XML, .INI... | |
| DBD::AnyData | various | same as AnyData with a DBI interface | |
| Tk::Style | XML | not on CPAN, for TK stylesheets | |
| AppConfig | text | configuration files can be overridden by command line arguments | |
| Config::IniFiles | text | MS-Windows style .ini files | |
| Inifile | text | MS-Windows style .ini files | |
| Boulder | text, XML | boulder format, plus various bio*-related formats |
Update: added Boulder as suggested below.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Persistence for options?
by miyagawa (Chaplain) on Aug 15, 2001 at 21:09 UTC | |
|
Re: Persistence for options?
by simonm (Vicar) on Aug 15, 2001 at 22:55 UTC | |
by riffraff (Pilgrim) on Sep 20, 2001 at 20:57 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: Persistence for options?
by meonkeys (Chaplain) on Aug 16, 2001 at 01:31 UTC |