Re^2: Why is PerlMonks.org still so ugly and outdated on presentation?

...or, I have 24'' LCD monitors with a resolution of 1920 * 1200 pixels, placed at a decent distance. The point being, I generally don't need to do that with other websites that present code-formated blocks. For example, I find Stack Overflow very pleasant to read.

Comment on Re^2: Why is PerlMonks.org still so ugly and outdated on presentation?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Why is PerlMonks.org still so ugly and outdated on presentation? by swampyankee (Parson) on Aug 27, 2013 at 04:28 UTC
I have a 13 in (33 cm) 1280 by 800 monitor at a decent distance (a bit less than arm's length), wear bifocals, and, oddly, don't have any problems. It also doesn't waste my time with Flash, animations, or such nonsense. Information about American English usage here and here. Floating point issues? Please read this before posting. — emc	[reply]
Re^4: Why is PerlMonks.org still so ugly and outdated on presentation? (tiny code) by tye (Sage) on Aug 27, 2013 at 06:11 UTC
I have a 13 [...] and, oddly, don't have any problems. And you have the "Large code font" option turned on. Anonymous Monk didn't have that option. (It still isn't an option, but a few days ago I unconditionally enabled it for anonymonk.) - tye	[reply]
Re^5: Why is PerlMonks.org still so ugly and outdated on presentation? (tiny code) by Anonymous Monk on Aug 27, 2013 at 20:33 UTC
`\o/`. Thanks, tye. I do use my own CSS to bend the layout to my tastes. That is however not possible on a 'puter that I cannot control or a user agent is not as accommodating as Opera (desktop; presto). All in all, that was a welcome change.	[reply]