in reply to Re^2: Something interesting i found today
in thread Something interesting i found today

this was in my "test.pl" when ever i need to test a theory or to just see what happens (the latter in this case) i use this and i don't need to use strict and warnings to test theorys
  • Comment on Re^3: Something interesting i found today

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Something interesting i found today
by Athanasius (Archbishop) on Aug 24, 2013 at 07:47 UTC

    Analogy: “I wear a lifejacket when I fish professionally. But I was only fishing recreationally, so I didn’t need one.” (Because it doesn’t matter if I drown when I’m only having fun?)

    strict and warnings are not there to cramp your style; they’re there to help you and save you time by alerting you to common mistakes you might otherwise overlook.

    Required reading: The strictures, according to Seuss.

    Hope that helps,

    Athanasius <°(((>< contra mundum Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica,

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

      Your analogy only makes sense if i was trying to incorporate this into a script. In this case i literally though "i wonder what happens when i try to subtract a number from a string" and i found out just fine without strict or warnings. I'm just saying it's not necessary ALL THE TIME.

[reply]
        i found out just fine without strict or warnings
        Yes, asking at PerlMonks is a frequent alternative to using strict and warnings.
        لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom