in reply to Re^2: Getopts::[Std|Long]. How define a option -L1
in thread Getopts::[Std|Long]. How define a option -L1
Ok, I think I understand what you’re looking for a little better now. Use Getopt::Long:
#! perl use strict; use warnings; use Getopt::Long; my $L1 = ''; my $L2 = ''; my $p = ''; GetOptions('L1=s' => \$L1, 'L2=s' => \$L2, p => \$p); print "L1 switch: $L1\n"; print "p switch: $p\n";
as documented in Getopt::Long. Output:
16:39 >perl 698_SoPW.pl --L1 foo -p L1 switch: foo p switch: 1 16:39 >
But note that if there is no L2 switch defined here, --L (or even -l) will be accepted as an abbreviation for L1. From the documentation, it appears that this is a feature, not a bug: see Case and abbreviations.
Hope that helps,
| Athanasius <°(((>< contra mundum | Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica, |
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Getopt::[Std|Long]. How define a option -L1
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 27, 2013 at 07:28 UTC | |
by Pazitiff (Novice) on Aug 28, 2013 at 06:36 UTC |