Re^2: Using Inline::C in a package

I would say there is a :: missing on line 7.

No. The OP is exactly correct. That is how Inline C is used. Though it is normal followd by some other arguments; Eg. This is my standard usage:

#! perl -slw
use strict;
use Inline C => Config => BUILD_NOISY => 1;
use Inline C => <<'END_C',  NAME => 'rdtsc', CLEAN_AFTER_BUILD => 0;

SV *rdtsc() {
    return newSVuv( (UV)__rdtsc() );
} 

...
END_C
use Data::Dump qw[ pp ];
use GD;
...
[download]

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^2: Using Inline::C in a package Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Using Inline::C in a package by choroba (Cardinal) on Sep 04, 2013 at 17:02 UTC
OK, I stand corrected. Is the repetition of the `use` line also demanded? لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Using Inline::C in a package by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 04, 2013 at 17:04 UTC
Often yes. See my update above. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^3: Using Inline::C in a package by rem45acp (Novice) on Sep 04, 2013 at 17:10 UTC
So does the C code go before the package declaration? I'm confused on where the perl methods go before or after the C code.	[reply]