in reply to Re: Extended Regular Expressions
in thread Extended Regular Expressions

Thanks, i got this to work as expected using "negated" character classes. My original question still remains as a puzzle. why aren't the results (aka. the values of $&) of the two pattern matches different by the single character 'j' (taken from "joe")? it seems they should be. the zero-width lookahead doesn't seem to be "zero-width" at all. Regards, jroberts

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re3: Extended Regular Expressions
by Hofmator (Curate) on Aug 16, 2001 at 19:40 UTC

    Ok, the problem with [^\z] can be easily seen when you use warnings - which is a good idea in general. Perl complains then about an unidentified escape sequence in the character class. This means that \z is not the end of the string in a character class!! All metacharacters loose their special meaning in a character class.

    So [^\z] is equivalent to [^z] which is a single character that is not a 'z'. Looking at your original regex print $& if /^<a href.*>(?=[^\z])/x; Consequently the .* in your regex eats up everything till the last '>' and checks if the next character is not a z. Which is true, as it is a newline. Ergo, match found, mystery solved :)

    -- Hofmator