in reply to Re^2: Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?
in thread Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?

You don't know if the performance penalty is small, who said the function isn't going to be used to run a billion times a second?

The mere thought of dealing with this by adding useless production code to fix a test problem I find very disturbing.

  • Comment on Re^3: Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?
by vsespb (Chaplain) on Sep 30, 2013 at 17:08 UTC
    In this my answer I am talking not about fixing test, but about adjusting your business-requirements. I don't see case when having program output to be URLs with random parameters ordering is good idea. Better normalized URLs.
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom