(tye)Re: Why did people vote for this?

Well, I didn't vote it up. But I didn't mind the post at all because I didn't read the last sentence of each argument for/against, which is where the apparent bad attitude shows up. Reread the post but stop reading as soon as you feel you get the general gist of each of the numbered items. I think you'll manage to completely miss the attitude problem if you do that.

I don't know how much of the upvotes can be explained that way, but I was so surprised when I found those bits via your node that I thought the insight might be useful.

- tye (but my friends call me "Tye")

Comment on (tye)Re: Why did people vote for this?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Why did people vote for this? by mpolo (Chaplain) on Aug 18, 2001 at 11:58 UTC
I missed the negativity in the tone when reading it as well. I personally didn't see the idea itself as too negative -- a list of stuff in the works. No promises, just "I think this is a good idea. Maybe some day." or "Never gonna happen." While I have seen lots more prominence given to the Offering Plate recently, I wasn't aware of the gravity of the current situation, and I thank you for bringing it to my attention. Personally, I can't do much about it as I have literally $0 to my name. (And 0 €, for that matter.) Other than encourage others to support the site, which seems almost hypocritical when I can't. Would there be a non-tacky way to put up a list of donors/"responsable members of the community", as a sort of incentive to have people support the site? I'm not talking about anything drastic involving the experience system, like $50/year => max level 5, $100/year => max level 6... Just a list of the monks who've donated, perhaps separated into levels of giving. Like the stuff the college alumni association always sends you, with the lists of all the people who want to show off how well-off they are or how much they love their alma mater. Maybe this would be too crass and materialistic for the monastery, though. P.S. Click here to prove you're a real PerlMonk.	[reply]
Re (tilly): (tye)Re: Why did people vote for this? by tilly (Archbishop) on Aug 18, 2001 at 14:21 UTC
You are right. I habitually just read things straight through so I hadn't noticed how different the impression is when you skim instead. That is a verbal trick I had not been aware of, and one I will pay attention to in the future so I can recognize when someone is doing it.	[reply]